The trend of pink notebooks is a rather new one as it is related to some other changes on the laptop market. Five years ago notebooks were mainly used by business people and some other technology lovers. They were used by people that wanted to be mobile with their computers and were willing to pay more to have a laptop computer.
The status of notebooks changed. The hardware of mobile computers got cheaper and this made it possible for notebooks to conquer new niches. One of the key events had been the Nicholas Negroponte's "One Laptop Per Child" project in 2005. Asus picked up this idea developed the "Asus Eee PC 700" the first so called "Netbook". This mini notebook computer had cheaper hardware but was good enough to surf in the internet, do office jobs and watch movies. By excluding an optical storage as well it got very cheap, small and ultra mobile. Nearly all big laptop manufacturers started to develop their own mini notebook computer.
With this much more affordable netbooks, mobile computing was more interesting for many more people. The focus was no longer on the performance or the specifications. All this small laptop computers have about the same performance and for this the main difference is now the way they look. The mini notebook computers are something that you carry around with you and for this you want to identify with it. It is no longer only a computer it is a fashion statement and lifestyle item and you want to be recognized with it. For this the laptop industry is now willing to bring a lot more fashion into the notebook market. One niche that stands out are sexy pink notebooks that are especially designed for the female taste.
With pink notebooks out, a new big market opened up accessories. There is now a high demand for ladies laptop bags which include pink laptop bags and as well other designer laptop bags. A big change comes with the pink notebook and the pink netbook, it is no longer used only for work or education, it became an item of fashion a lifestyle.
Shamina Power is a Student from Munich Germany. She is crazy about pink electronic widgets especially mobile computers.
Site: Notebook Comparison Article: Life Is Pink Notebook
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/
Tuesday, 13 July 2010
Pink Laptop Brands By JR Lang
Laptop computers have really become an integral part of the computer market industry. While some years ago desktop models dominated the marketplace, these days, the laptop, which is just a mobile version of the standard larger and stationary desktop, is at the top of the shopping list for most consumers, and for good reason. Laptops provide every possible computing solution but in a portable, handy and mobile device.
Today's laptops are far more advanced than their ancestors, with advanced computing capabilities as well as abundant choices of features, options and colors. Yes, the pink laptop has seen a growing popularity among consumers, and has become a real fashion statement for the lover of pink.
The continuing demand for pink laptops has prompted several manufactures to create them in various shades of pink. Also, don't think for even a minute that the pink laptop brands are some sissy machines, quite the contrary, they are as powerful and offer as much performance as their monochrome counterparts, but also look great as well. The following is a list of manufacturers that make laptops in pink and a look at those models.
Dell
Dell makes two pink laptop models, the Inspiron Mini Netbook and the Inspiron 14 standard size laptop. Both come with a variety of features and options that suit a variety of mobile computing needs.
Sony VAIO
Sony is a top name in laptop computers and the Sony VAIO brand pink laptops not only come in a great bright and shiny pink, but are efficient entertainment and computing machines as well. Featuring, the Intel Centrino Dual Core Processor, touch sensitive embedded A/V controls that change music tracks and volume instantly, superb surround sound through the built-in speakers, up to 4 GB of RAM and a lot more.
Lenovo Pink Models
Lenovo offers the mini laptop version in pink. The Lenovo Idea Pad S10 is loaded with some great features, including, an Intel Atom processor, an 80GB hard drive, built-in webcam and a lot more.
Asus Pink Laptops
Asus brand offers 6 laptop models in a variety of pink tones in their Eee models series and they also have a great starter laptop in pink for little girls. Asus is well known for creating user-friendly computers that offer an intuitive graphic interface. There are several shades of pink available with the Asus models and they also boast premium high quality finishes. Features, various screen sizes from 7 to 10 inches, 2Gb - 8GB hard drives, built in WI-FI and a lot more.
Hewlett Packard
HP specializes in mini laptop brands in pink. The HP models are very thin, about 1 inch and so they are much more portable than other pink laptop brands. The HP 210 Mini pink laptop is well known for having a very large keyboard and comes in a few models each with their own features, including an HD model.
Toshiba
The Toshiba NB 205 gives the pink lover everything they need to surf the Internet, email and word process in an ultra thin model that is lightweight and compact enough to fit into that pink purse! In fact, this pink laptop brand has won the PC Mag Editors choice award so that makes is a sure fire winner. Features, an Intel Atom Processor, Windows 7, 1GB RAM, 250 GB hard drive and much more.
The Toshiba Satellite comes in a soft and subtle purply pink, along with an Intel Pentium Processor, 4GB RAM, 500GB hard drive. Its weight of 4.5 lbs and long battery life makes it the ideal travel laptop that does not sacrifice performance for portability.
Acer Pink Laptop Models
Acer offers the Aspire One AOA150-1570 in pink, as well as other models. Acer always offers quality machines, and a lot of bang for the buck, featuring Intel Atom processors, SATA hard drives, lots of RAM and a bright display.
Samsung
Samsung NC10-11GP 10.2 inch mini Netbook in pink is sleek and stylish and packed with features.
If you love pink, please visit us at Pink Laptops, we have some cool laptop guides, articles and laptop reviews like the, Acer Pink Laptop Reviews, and we offer cheap shopping on everything pink, including, cheap pink laptops, cell phones, iPods, gadgets and of course, pink accessories.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com
Today's laptops are far more advanced than their ancestors, with advanced computing capabilities as well as abundant choices of features, options and colors. Yes, the pink laptop has seen a growing popularity among consumers, and has become a real fashion statement for the lover of pink.
The continuing demand for pink laptops has prompted several manufactures to create them in various shades of pink. Also, don't think for even a minute that the pink laptop brands are some sissy machines, quite the contrary, they are as powerful and offer as much performance as their monochrome counterparts, but also look great as well. The following is a list of manufacturers that make laptops in pink and a look at those models.
Dell
Dell makes two pink laptop models, the Inspiron Mini Netbook and the Inspiron 14 standard size laptop. Both come with a variety of features and options that suit a variety of mobile computing needs.
Sony VAIO
Sony is a top name in laptop computers and the Sony VAIO brand pink laptops not only come in a great bright and shiny pink, but are efficient entertainment and computing machines as well. Featuring, the Intel Centrino Dual Core Processor, touch sensitive embedded A/V controls that change music tracks and volume instantly, superb surround sound through the built-in speakers, up to 4 GB of RAM and a lot more.
Lenovo Pink Models
Lenovo offers the mini laptop version in pink. The Lenovo Idea Pad S10 is loaded with some great features, including, an Intel Atom processor, an 80GB hard drive, built-in webcam and a lot more.
Asus Pink Laptops
Asus brand offers 6 laptop models in a variety of pink tones in their Eee models series and they also have a great starter laptop in pink for little girls. Asus is well known for creating user-friendly computers that offer an intuitive graphic interface. There are several shades of pink available with the Asus models and they also boast premium high quality finishes. Features, various screen sizes from 7 to 10 inches, 2Gb - 8GB hard drives, built in WI-FI and a lot more.
Hewlett Packard
HP specializes in mini laptop brands in pink. The HP models are very thin, about 1 inch and so they are much more portable than other pink laptop brands. The HP 210 Mini pink laptop is well known for having a very large keyboard and comes in a few models each with their own features, including an HD model.
Toshiba
The Toshiba NB 205 gives the pink lover everything they need to surf the Internet, email and word process in an ultra thin model that is lightweight and compact enough to fit into that pink purse! In fact, this pink laptop brand has won the PC Mag Editors choice award so that makes is a sure fire winner. Features, an Intel Atom Processor, Windows 7, 1GB RAM, 250 GB hard drive and much more.
The Toshiba Satellite comes in a soft and subtle purply pink, along with an Intel Pentium Processor, 4GB RAM, 500GB hard drive. Its weight of 4.5 lbs and long battery life makes it the ideal travel laptop that does not sacrifice performance for portability.
Acer Pink Laptop Models
Acer offers the Aspire One AOA150-1570 in pink, as well as other models. Acer always offers quality machines, and a lot of bang for the buck, featuring Intel Atom processors, SATA hard drives, lots of RAM and a bright display.
Samsung
Samsung NC10-11GP 10.2 inch mini Netbook in pink is sleek and stylish and packed with features.
If you love pink, please visit us at Pink Laptops, we have some cool laptop guides, articles and laptop reviews like the, Acer Pink Laptop Reviews, and we offer cheap shopping on everything pink, including, cheap pink laptops, cell phones, iPods, gadgets and of course, pink accessories.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com
HP Envy 17 Review - See This Laptop's Great Features By Nadav Snir
HP has introduced HP Envy 17 and HP Envy 14 almost simultaneously. These two laptops have features that are revolutionary in the laptop market and the Envy 17 could be the laptop to beat.
For people who are fond of big screens, the Envy 17 would be ideal. The screen is 17" and the laptop is packed with a host of powerful features. For starters, the laptop's configurations use HP's core i3 and i5 processors. In addition, this laptop has a DVD burner and an HDMI port and allows for the expansion of RAM up to 8GB.
For a computer with such a powerful processor, the ability to keep it sufficiently cooled can present quite a challenge as experiences with the HP Envy 15 have shown. One of the major complaints about Envy 15 was the amount of heat it generated and HP has addressed this problem in the manufacture of HP Envy 17. To address the issue of excess heat, HP has added vents on the battery slice in addition to repositioning some of the components.
HP Envy 17 is not only a powerful laptop but one that is also very cool looking. Covered in Aluminum, with a glass screen and a backlit keyboard, this laptop looks extremely elegant. For this laptop also, the mouse buttons are integrated into the touchpad. The size might discourage you from carrying it around - smaller laptops are the preference of the majority, and for this reason most people buying this laptop would be doing so to replace their desktops.
Because of its many advanced features and the attention to detail that has been observed in making this product, the Envy 17 is available at a premium price. However, it is possible to purchase the laptop at a discount. By obtaining HP Envy 17 discount coupons, the savings you could make on the purchase price can be quite substantial. Moreover, reading reviews on this product will help you make an informed decision on what to expect from your laptop.
When you buy HP Envy 17, you will benefit from the manufacturer's one-year limited warranty on hardware. Since the company also provides support via email and live chat 24/7, purchasers of their products know they are not alone should the machine develop complications. Moreover, HP has an in-house service through which it sends staff to attend to clients who need repairs or for trouble shooting in the clients' homes.
As you saw in this HP Envy 17 review, the many advanced features of this laptop make it good value for money.
About the author:
Nadav Snir operates a website which includes coupons and discounts to the best electronics stores on the web. To get those discounts, visit: http://Great-Info-Products.com/Electronics/index.html
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com
For people who are fond of big screens, the Envy 17 would be ideal. The screen is 17" and the laptop is packed with a host of powerful features. For starters, the laptop's configurations use HP's core i3 and i5 processors. In addition, this laptop has a DVD burner and an HDMI port and allows for the expansion of RAM up to 8GB.
For a computer with such a powerful processor, the ability to keep it sufficiently cooled can present quite a challenge as experiences with the HP Envy 15 have shown. One of the major complaints about Envy 15 was the amount of heat it generated and HP has addressed this problem in the manufacture of HP Envy 17. To address the issue of excess heat, HP has added vents on the battery slice in addition to repositioning some of the components.
HP Envy 17 is not only a powerful laptop but one that is also very cool looking. Covered in Aluminum, with a glass screen and a backlit keyboard, this laptop looks extremely elegant. For this laptop also, the mouse buttons are integrated into the touchpad. The size might discourage you from carrying it around - smaller laptops are the preference of the majority, and for this reason most people buying this laptop would be doing so to replace their desktops.
Because of its many advanced features and the attention to detail that has been observed in making this product, the Envy 17 is available at a premium price. However, it is possible to purchase the laptop at a discount. By obtaining HP Envy 17 discount coupons, the savings you could make on the purchase price can be quite substantial. Moreover, reading reviews on this product will help you make an informed decision on what to expect from your laptop.
When you buy HP Envy 17, you will benefit from the manufacturer's one-year limited warranty on hardware. Since the company also provides support via email and live chat 24/7, purchasers of their products know they are not alone should the machine develop complications. Moreover, HP has an in-house service through which it sends staff to attend to clients who need repairs or for trouble shooting in the clients' homes.
As you saw in this HP Envy 17 review, the many advanced features of this laptop make it good value for money.
About the author:
Nadav Snir operates a website which includes coupons and discounts to the best electronics stores on the web. To get those discounts, visit: http://Great-Info-Products.com/Electronics/index.html
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com
HP Plans to Release a Tablet Running on WebOS By Dan Sparrow
Since the new market of touch screen tables has taken shape, the HP company have always wanted to be one of the top players providing quality products that people would love and buy. However things did not go according to plan and even though they have a promising start with their Slate tablet, they ended up losing the race in front of the wildly popular Apple iPad.
At the beginning of this year HP's Slate tablet was tipped to be one of the strongest competitors for the yet unreleased iPad. But a shot while after the official launch, the Slate did not manage to become popular among users, on the contrary, it started to get negative reviews. The main thing that consumers objected to was the relative slow speed of the tablet and that was mostly due to the operating system which at that time was Windows 7. Shortly after the release and the commercial flop of the Slate, it was taken out of production by HP.
This might have looked like HP had given up on the tablets market and decided to focus on other markets where they already were influential. But this is not the case as HP recently have bought the Palm company for $1.2 billion and as a consequence they obtained all the rights for Palm's very successful operating system WebOS. This is a very important asset for HP, as WebOS was primarily made for smartphones and tablets and has proven to be successful in a long series of different Palm gadgets.
After taking over the Palm company, HP have publicly stated that they plan to release a series of smartphones and tablets. Most probably, all of these future gadgets will employ the use of WebOS as operating system. So HP will definitely attack the tablet market once again but it remains to be seen if they will resurrect the previously unsuccessful Slate or if they will make a new product altogether. It has also been rumored that by the end of this year they'll launch a new tables called the Hurricane, which at least according to it's name, promises to take the tablet market by storm.
Click on the following link to find out more information about HP PCs.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com
At the beginning of this year HP's Slate tablet was tipped to be one of the strongest competitors for the yet unreleased iPad. But a shot while after the official launch, the Slate did not manage to become popular among users, on the contrary, it started to get negative reviews. The main thing that consumers objected to was the relative slow speed of the tablet and that was mostly due to the operating system which at that time was Windows 7. Shortly after the release and the commercial flop of the Slate, it was taken out of production by HP.
This might have looked like HP had given up on the tablets market and decided to focus on other markets where they already were influential. But this is not the case as HP recently have bought the Palm company for $1.2 billion and as a consequence they obtained all the rights for Palm's very successful operating system WebOS. This is a very important asset for HP, as WebOS was primarily made for smartphones and tablets and has proven to be successful in a long series of different Palm gadgets.
After taking over the Palm company, HP have publicly stated that they plan to release a series of smartphones and tablets. Most probably, all of these future gadgets will employ the use of WebOS as operating system. So HP will definitely attack the tablet market once again but it remains to be seen if they will resurrect the previously unsuccessful Slate or if they will make a new product altogether. It has also been rumored that by the end of this year they'll launch a new tables called the Hurricane, which at least according to it's name, promises to take the tablet market by storm.
Click on the following link to find out more information about HP PCs.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com
Flower Girl Dresses For Summer By Karen Etchels
Every bride should have the most special day of their life on their wedding day and it is no different with their little flower girls. There is such a huge choice of flower girl dresses that it is often very difficult to make the right choice. At this exciting time it is so important to get the perfect flower girl dress which is both beautiful and elegant in its own right as well as fitting in well with the bridal dress itself.
Parents are increasingly looking online to help source their flower girl outfits. It is important to not only find the right style of dress but also fabric, colour and length. If you get it just right you should be able to find a dress which has the cornerstone look for both casual and formal wear meaning the flower girl dress will look just right for the wedding but also be useable on various other occasions throughout the year.
There are many styles which can go straight from the wedding day to evening when it comes to flowergirl dresses. Once really good idea is to accessorise the dress and add a bag, shoes and even a faux fur shrug...this would look perfect for the wedding itself but be removed in the evening for a more casual look.
The fabric choice is huge with flower girl dresses coming in silk, satin, tafetta and dupioni silk too. A flower corsage can complete the look and also be removed for more informal wear on another occasion. Of course the dress will have to fit the wedding theme and so colour and style can be even more important. Flower girl dresses traditionally come in an ivory or cream but these can be brightened up with contrast colour sashes or you could go for a contrast colour dress in say turquoise, red or pink. There is also a vast choice of floral dresses on the market as well just now.
One of the most frustrating things about flower girl dresses is the fact that you have to purchase a dress just for this one off occasion. This can be very pricey and the dress only be worn for a short time. If this is a problem look for a dual purpose dress....one which is made of washable material but can also be dressed up for a special day, then be worn for other important occasions and even turned into a fancy dress costume once it has been used.
http://www.fairytalefashions.co.uk The author advises women on their flower girl dresses, including bags, shoes and other stylish accessories, at her online store, Fairytale Fashions.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com
Parents are increasingly looking online to help source their flower girl outfits. It is important to not only find the right style of dress but also fabric, colour and length. If you get it just right you should be able to find a dress which has the cornerstone look for both casual and formal wear meaning the flower girl dress will look just right for the wedding but also be useable on various other occasions throughout the year.
There are many styles which can go straight from the wedding day to evening when it comes to flowergirl dresses. Once really good idea is to accessorise the dress and add a bag, shoes and even a faux fur shrug...this would look perfect for the wedding itself but be removed in the evening for a more casual look.
The fabric choice is huge with flower girl dresses coming in silk, satin, tafetta and dupioni silk too. A flower corsage can complete the look and also be removed for more informal wear on another occasion. Of course the dress will have to fit the wedding theme and so colour and style can be even more important. Flower girl dresses traditionally come in an ivory or cream but these can be brightened up with contrast colour sashes or you could go for a contrast colour dress in say turquoise, red or pink. There is also a vast choice of floral dresses on the market as well just now.
One of the most frustrating things about flower girl dresses is the fact that you have to purchase a dress just for this one off occasion. This can be very pricey and the dress only be worn for a short time. If this is a problem look for a dual purpose dress....one which is made of washable material but can also be dressed up for a special day, then be worn for other important occasions and even turned into a fancy dress costume once it has been used.
http://www.fairytalefashions.co.uk The author advises women on their flower girl dresses, including bags, shoes and other stylish accessories, at her online store, Fairytale Fashions.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com
Forlan: A reward for Uruguayan football (FIFA.com) Monday 12 July 2010 Forlan: A reward for Uruguayan football
If there was one thing lacking from Diego Forlan’s stellar performance here at the 2010 FIFA World Cup™ it was a piece of silverware, particularly after the deadly striker just missed out on clinching the adidas Golden Shoe for the competition’s top scorer. No matter, the inspirational Uruguayan No10 instead made off with the coveted adidas Golden Ball – awarded to the finest player at this year’s finals on South African soil.
Forlan thus becomes the fourth South American to claim the prize, following in the footsteps of Argentina’s Diego Maradona (1986) and Brazilian duo Romario (1994) and Ronaldo (1998). Just minutes after learning of his award, the Atletico Madrid hitman spoke exclusively to FIFA.com.
FIFA.com: Diego, how does it feel to have won the Golden Ball?Diego Forlan: It’s as great as it is unexpected. I never even imagined something like this, nor did I have my sights set on it. As I’m a striker, I perhaps could have seen myself chasing the Golden Shoe, and in fact I came close. That would have been more normal. But to go from that to winning the prize for the best player... I’m enjoying it and I’m delighted, but I’m very aware that it’s the result of the spectacular tournament the team has had. It’s another reward for this positive period for Uruguayan football.
How did you find out you’d won?To be honest, after I was nominated I decided to wait and see what happened, especially as there were rumours that I might win but nobody was revealing anything. Then I got a message from a friend in Buenos Aires which said 'Congratulations, you’ve won the Golden Ball’. Then my agent called me and confirmed it. I started getting more calls and suddenly all my squad-mates had charged into my room, and before I knew it they’d chucked me into the hotel swimming pool!
And yet you’re dedicating it to the people who did that to you...It was incredible how they all came to my room to congratulate me. The fact that my team-mates and a lot of people back home in Uruguay pinned their hopes on me, and I was able to repay that faith out on the pitch while being just another member of the team, makes me feel very happy. I’d also like to highlight those lads who didn’t play much or didn’t feature at all. Those guys make up the backbone of the squad and this award is for them too.
Do you ever worry receiving this kind of recognition will go to your head?I’ve won other awards during my career and I’m very grateful, but I don’t let them stop my feet from staying on the ground. I’ve got parents who taught me key values and brothers and sisters who help me stay on the right path. Everything is the result of hard work, so I’ll keep working to try and improve.
Does this prize help make up for Uruguay not finishing on the podium?I’m very happy about this award and the goals I scored, but to be honest I’m heading home a little sad because, having watched the Final, it hit me how close we were to playing in it. Losing the semi-final was a really cruel blow, which took me a couple of days to get over and which I still find hard to swallow.
Are you looking forward to having the Golden Ball in your hands?I’ve not had much time to find out about that, but I gather that they’ll give me it in Zurich. I must admit that I’d have liked to have flown back to Uruguay with it. There’s no doubt it would have been the icing on the cake at the party they’re waiting to throw for us back in our country.
If you keep picking up awards, you’ll end up with no room on your mantelpiece soon...It’ll definitely look good next to my two Pichichi awards for top scoring in the Spanish league! (laughs) We’ll find a good place for it, I’m sure of that.
Finally, were Spain worthy champions?No doubt about it. They played the best football over the course of the tournament, they managed to bounce back quickly from their defeat against Switzerland and they always looked to take the initiative. Let me take this opportunity to congratulate their players and coaching staff. Let’s hope one day it happens to us too!
Forlan thus becomes the fourth South American to claim the prize, following in the footsteps of Argentina’s Diego Maradona (1986) and Brazilian duo Romario (1994) and Ronaldo (1998). Just minutes after learning of his award, the Atletico Madrid hitman spoke exclusively to FIFA.com.
FIFA.com: Diego, how does it feel to have won the Golden Ball?Diego Forlan: It’s as great as it is unexpected. I never even imagined something like this, nor did I have my sights set on it. As I’m a striker, I perhaps could have seen myself chasing the Golden Shoe, and in fact I came close. That would have been more normal. But to go from that to winning the prize for the best player... I’m enjoying it and I’m delighted, but I’m very aware that it’s the result of the spectacular tournament the team has had. It’s another reward for this positive period for Uruguayan football.
How did you find out you’d won?To be honest, after I was nominated I decided to wait and see what happened, especially as there were rumours that I might win but nobody was revealing anything. Then I got a message from a friend in Buenos Aires which said 'Congratulations, you’ve won the Golden Ball’. Then my agent called me and confirmed it. I started getting more calls and suddenly all my squad-mates had charged into my room, and before I knew it they’d chucked me into the hotel swimming pool!
And yet you’re dedicating it to the people who did that to you...It was incredible how they all came to my room to congratulate me. The fact that my team-mates and a lot of people back home in Uruguay pinned their hopes on me, and I was able to repay that faith out on the pitch while being just another member of the team, makes me feel very happy. I’d also like to highlight those lads who didn’t play much or didn’t feature at all. Those guys make up the backbone of the squad and this award is for them too.
Do you ever worry receiving this kind of recognition will go to your head?I’ve won other awards during my career and I’m very grateful, but I don’t let them stop my feet from staying on the ground. I’ve got parents who taught me key values and brothers and sisters who help me stay on the right path. Everything is the result of hard work, so I’ll keep working to try and improve.
The fact that my team-mates and a lot of people back home in Uruguay pinned their hopes on me, and I was able to repay that faith out on the pitch while being just another member of the team, makes me feel very happy.
Uruguay striker Diego Forlan
Are you looking forward to having the Golden Ball in your hands?I’ve not had much time to find out about that, but I gather that they’ll give me it in Zurich. I must admit that I’d have liked to have flown back to Uruguay with it. There’s no doubt it would have been the icing on the cake at the party they’re waiting to throw for us back in our country.
If you keep picking up awards, you’ll end up with no room on your mantelpiece soon...It’ll definitely look good next to my two Pichichi awards for top scoring in the Spanish league! (laughs) We’ll find a good place for it, I’m sure of that.
Finally, were Spain worthy champions?No doubt about it. They played the best football over the course of the tournament, they managed to bounce back quickly from their defeat against Switzerland and they always looked to take the initiative. Let me take this opportunity to congratulate their players and coaching staff. Let’s hope one day it happens to us too!
Monday, 12 July 2010
File Transfer Service Buyers Guide BY: Dustin Sklavos, NotebookReview.com Contributor
By Dustin Sklavos
E-mail is a great method for sending text over the Internet, but when it comes to sending large file, you'll likely need a more robust data transfer system. We break down four of the best File Transfer services available today in this buyers guide.
When I'm not writing hardware and software reviews, I'm a filmmaker. My composer has lived on the opposite side of the continent for as long as I've known him, but because of internet technology we're able to collaborate on films without so much as a phone call. I can send him video clips, he can score them and send them back, and I can just e-mail him and tell him "do this, that, and the other." We are by far not the only ones doing this.
Even beyond the arts, oftentimes friends need a specific file from you, a text file, or an image, or whatever. Maybe you need to make a single file or series of files available to specific people. I can tell you that while having your own site and server space can certainly make things easier, but logging into your FTP and oftentimes having to create an HTML file just to link to a file can be a major hassle.
Long story short: multiple sites and services have devised ways for you to get your material into the hands of the people you want it to. I already espoused the virtues of Dropbox previously, but today I bring you four other options for sharing files -- FilesAnywhere, YouSendIt, RapidShare and WeTransfer -- and discuss the pros and cons of each.
FILESANYWHERE
Using FilesAnywhere, I got the distinct sense their service was designed for power users and only power users.
FilesAnywhere signupFilesAnywhere service page
Signing up for their service is easy enough, and like many they offer paid usage models that expand their features and give you more flexibility. Unfortunately, compared to the other three services we're playing with today, FilesAnywhere's file size limitation for free users is punishingly small. 25MB per file is generally adequate enough to send a compressed song, or a text file, or a PDF, but severely curtails the service's usefulness.
What's worse, the service is hard to use. I can appreciate a robust service, but the level of abstraction here is poorly handled. FilesAnywhere's interface grossly over-emphasizes functionality, and is needlessly complex. It strikes me as being as obtuse as older Linux GUIs used to be, and I get the feeling that's the kind of user they're gunning for.
Even the number of plans they offer feels needlessly complicated at a staggering seven different account types. This is just unnecessary. Even at the enterprise level, I can only imagine IT grunts having to explain to their technophobic management about why they should go with FilesAnywhere, then having those managers take one look at the site and tell their employees to shove off. I'm all for more power and more features, but it needs to be abstracted far better than it is here.
I may be being too hard on FilesAnywhere. Having what amounts to your own personal hard disk floating around on the internet -- like Dropbox -- is certainly useful. The ability to use the service to send a fax(!) or even receive faxes on a paid account is obscure but handy. You can still use it to just post a file and send people links to download that file. But between the grossly limited file size for free users and the complexity of the service, I have a hard time recommending FilesAnywhere.
YOUSENDIT
After FilesAnywhere, YouSendIt is the only service in our roundup that requires you to sign up and create an account. For our purposes, I created a 14-day trial account of the "Pro" plan.
YouSendIt signup pageYouSendIt service page
As a small pat on the back, I'd like to say that I appreciated YouSendIt not asking me for credit card information for the 14-day trial account. There's a free account you can sign up for, but it's just slightly buried in the "Plans & Sign Up" page; the front page makes no mention of it. That account is very limited with a maximum file size of 100MB, but the "paltry" 100 downloads per file makes up for it somewhat. 100MB is not ideal but at least somewhat reasonable.
What's striking is how open the pricing is for add-ons when you send files. There are just checkboxes with prices next to them, offering extra features beyond just the basic "upload-and-e-mail" service. Truthfully I was a little put off by this, as it felt like an attempt to nickel-and-dime people, but all of those services can be added into your account if you use one of the two plans beyond "Pro."
Where YouSendIt really distinguishes itself from the competition is in the sheer flexibility of the service. There are plug-ins available for Outlook, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft Office, Final Cut Pro, Aperture, iPhoto, and Photoshop, along with tracker apps for the iPhone and BlackBerry!
Ultimately YouSendIt works as advertised. You upload a file, they send a link in e-mail, and the recipient downloads that file off of the server. I appreciated the simplicity, especially after trying to work my way through FilesAnywhere's feature bloat.
RAPIDSHARE
RapidShare may be the most well-known of the services in this roundup, and for a quick "here's this file for you" it really can't be beat. There's no sign-up required, no e-mail address required. You upload your file on the front page, they give you a link that you can then IM or e-mail yourself, or you can enter an e-mail address (or several) and a message and they'll e-mail the link for you.
RapidShare service pageIf you're asking for simplicity I have a hard time finding any way to distill file-sharing down any more than this. Which is why it's unfortunate how hazy things start to really get on the RapidShare site. Having a Craigslist level of simplicity in your page design is fine and appreciated these days, but the design here leaves a bad taste in my mouth. You can sign up for a Premium Account which will offer more of everything, or you can sign up for a Collector's Account, for which no information exists on their site other than to tell you that you accumulate points using it that eventually lead to a free Premium Account.
A warning over the FAQ that its answers might be out of date doesn't exactly instill confidence either. RapidShare as an operation may be simple, but it feels slapdash and there's nothing there that makes me feel like giving them money. As I said before, for basic "here's your file!" RapidShare is pretty excellent, but beyond that it just seems too obscured to be trustworthy. Some clarity on the site would go a long way.
WETRANSFER
Our last contender is WeTransfer, and that's basically what they do. When I opened their page, my first and most immediate reaction was "holy crap, it's all Flash." The basic, main page that any user is going to see and spend the most time on is done entirely in Flash. Using Flash for your entire front page just seems like asking for netbooks everywhere to burst into flames.
WeTransfer service pageGood thing WeTransfer works well, then. There's no account to sign up for and I don't get the sense there ever will be. WeTransfer has a tiny panel in the center of your browser that lets you send someone (or up to twenty someones) a link to a file of up to 2GB on their server. That link will last for two weeks. The interface is simple and attractive, and the only reason RapidShare beats it for simplicity is because WeTransfer requires e-mail addresses. The flipside is that WeTransfer is, on the whole, easier to use.
But there's that Flash thing. I have no problem with Flash, but doing your site entirely in Flash and then having on the FAQ page "HTML version coming soon" screams "backwards" to me. Advertising is handled by having rotating images in the background, and these images are actually quite attractive. They're not hideous flashing ads or anything like that, just tasteful, textless high-resolution stills. Click the background and you're taken to the advertiser's site. I don't know that this model will work, but I give them points for trying. Still, I'm not sure Flash is necessary to achieve what they've done here, or at least not a browser window full of it.
CONCLUSION
The interesting thing about this roundup is that ultimately every service acquits itself fairly well for its specific purpose. I don't think we have any major challengers for Dropbox, which will probably remain my weapon of choice for collaborative projects for the foreseeable future.
Of all the services, only FilesAnywhere really operates as net-based storage, and if you're willing to weed through the countless features and figure out which of the seven plans is right for you, I can see it being incredibly useful and powerful. But it's pretty clearly for the power user, and you know who you are. Grandma Millie should steer clear.
YouSendIt and WeTransfer occupy similar space, I think, since they're really e-mail-centric services. If you need a basic means of disseminating files, WeTransfer's a great option, while YouSendIt is much more robust and offers more features.
Finally, RapidShare's best feature is its front page: the ability to just upload a file and then shoot the link out to a few friends makes it ideal for a quick transfer. Anything beyond that I find suspect, and information just isn't as readily available on their site as it needs to be.
What you're left with now are five services that all occupy very specific niches. Of all of them, I think FilesAnywhere tries the hardest to cover all the bases, but even ignoring quibbles with their interface design there is complexity that must be added in order to handle all of those different uses. But there isn't a single authentically bad or silly service in this lot, and if one (or all!) of them sounds like it suits your needs, godspeed.
E-mail is a great method for sending text over the Internet, but when it comes to sending large file, you'll likely need a more robust data transfer system. We break down four of the best File Transfer services available today in this buyers guide.
When I'm not writing hardware and software reviews, I'm a filmmaker. My composer has lived on the opposite side of the continent for as long as I've known him, but because of internet technology we're able to collaborate on films without so much as a phone call. I can send him video clips, he can score them and send them back, and I can just e-mail him and tell him "do this, that, and the other." We are by far not the only ones doing this.
Even beyond the arts, oftentimes friends need a specific file from you, a text file, or an image, or whatever. Maybe you need to make a single file or series of files available to specific people. I can tell you that while having your own site and server space can certainly make things easier, but logging into your FTP and oftentimes having to create an HTML file just to link to a file can be a major hassle.
Long story short: multiple sites and services have devised ways for you to get your material into the hands of the people you want it to. I already espoused the virtues of Dropbox previously, but today I bring you four other options for sharing files -- FilesAnywhere, YouSendIt, RapidShare and WeTransfer -- and discuss the pros and cons of each.
FILESANYWHERE
Using FilesAnywhere, I got the distinct sense their service was designed for power users and only power users.
FilesAnywhere signupFilesAnywhere service page
Signing up for their service is easy enough, and like many they offer paid usage models that expand their features and give you more flexibility. Unfortunately, compared to the other three services we're playing with today, FilesAnywhere's file size limitation for free users is punishingly small. 25MB per file is generally adequate enough to send a compressed song, or a text file, or a PDF, but severely curtails the service's usefulness.
What's worse, the service is hard to use. I can appreciate a robust service, but the level of abstraction here is poorly handled. FilesAnywhere's interface grossly over-emphasizes functionality, and is needlessly complex. It strikes me as being as obtuse as older Linux GUIs used to be, and I get the feeling that's the kind of user they're gunning for.
Even the number of plans they offer feels needlessly complicated at a staggering seven different account types. This is just unnecessary. Even at the enterprise level, I can only imagine IT grunts having to explain to their technophobic management about why they should go with FilesAnywhere, then having those managers take one look at the site and tell their employees to shove off. I'm all for more power and more features, but it needs to be abstracted far better than it is here.
I may be being too hard on FilesAnywhere. Having what amounts to your own personal hard disk floating around on the internet -- like Dropbox -- is certainly useful. The ability to use the service to send a fax(!) or even receive faxes on a paid account is obscure but handy. You can still use it to just post a file and send people links to download that file. But between the grossly limited file size for free users and the complexity of the service, I have a hard time recommending FilesAnywhere.
YOUSENDIT
After FilesAnywhere, YouSendIt is the only service in our roundup that requires you to sign up and create an account. For our purposes, I created a 14-day trial account of the "Pro" plan.
YouSendIt signup pageYouSendIt service page
As a small pat on the back, I'd like to say that I appreciated YouSendIt not asking me for credit card information for the 14-day trial account. There's a free account you can sign up for, but it's just slightly buried in the "Plans & Sign Up" page; the front page makes no mention of it. That account is very limited with a maximum file size of 100MB, but the "paltry" 100 downloads per file makes up for it somewhat. 100MB is not ideal but at least somewhat reasonable.
What's striking is how open the pricing is for add-ons when you send files. There are just checkboxes with prices next to them, offering extra features beyond just the basic "upload-and-e-mail" service. Truthfully I was a little put off by this, as it felt like an attempt to nickel-and-dime people, but all of those services can be added into your account if you use one of the two plans beyond "Pro."
Where YouSendIt really distinguishes itself from the competition is in the sheer flexibility of the service. There are plug-ins available for Outlook, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft Office, Final Cut Pro, Aperture, iPhoto, and Photoshop, along with tracker apps for the iPhone and BlackBerry!
Ultimately YouSendIt works as advertised. You upload a file, they send a link in e-mail, and the recipient downloads that file off of the server. I appreciated the simplicity, especially after trying to work my way through FilesAnywhere's feature bloat.
RAPIDSHARE
RapidShare may be the most well-known of the services in this roundup, and for a quick "here's this file for you" it really can't be beat. There's no sign-up required, no e-mail address required. You upload your file on the front page, they give you a link that you can then IM or e-mail yourself, or you can enter an e-mail address (or several) and a message and they'll e-mail the link for you.
RapidShare service pageIf you're asking for simplicity I have a hard time finding any way to distill file-sharing down any more than this. Which is why it's unfortunate how hazy things start to really get on the RapidShare site. Having a Craigslist level of simplicity in your page design is fine and appreciated these days, but the design here leaves a bad taste in my mouth. You can sign up for a Premium Account which will offer more of everything, or you can sign up for a Collector's Account, for which no information exists on their site other than to tell you that you accumulate points using it that eventually lead to a free Premium Account.
A warning over the FAQ that its answers might be out of date doesn't exactly instill confidence either. RapidShare as an operation may be simple, but it feels slapdash and there's nothing there that makes me feel like giving them money. As I said before, for basic "here's your file!" RapidShare is pretty excellent, but beyond that it just seems too obscured to be trustworthy. Some clarity on the site would go a long way.
WETRANSFER
Our last contender is WeTransfer, and that's basically what they do. When I opened their page, my first and most immediate reaction was "holy crap, it's all Flash." The basic, main page that any user is going to see and spend the most time on is done entirely in Flash. Using Flash for your entire front page just seems like asking for netbooks everywhere to burst into flames.
WeTransfer service pageGood thing WeTransfer works well, then. There's no account to sign up for and I don't get the sense there ever will be. WeTransfer has a tiny panel in the center of your browser that lets you send someone (or up to twenty someones) a link to a file of up to 2GB on their server. That link will last for two weeks. The interface is simple and attractive, and the only reason RapidShare beats it for simplicity is because WeTransfer requires e-mail addresses. The flipside is that WeTransfer is, on the whole, easier to use.
But there's that Flash thing. I have no problem with Flash, but doing your site entirely in Flash and then having on the FAQ page "HTML version coming soon" screams "backwards" to me. Advertising is handled by having rotating images in the background, and these images are actually quite attractive. They're not hideous flashing ads or anything like that, just tasteful, textless high-resolution stills. Click the background and you're taken to the advertiser's site. I don't know that this model will work, but I give them points for trying. Still, I'm not sure Flash is necessary to achieve what they've done here, or at least not a browser window full of it.
CONCLUSION
The interesting thing about this roundup is that ultimately every service acquits itself fairly well for its specific purpose. I don't think we have any major challengers for Dropbox, which will probably remain my weapon of choice for collaborative projects for the foreseeable future.
Of all the services, only FilesAnywhere really operates as net-based storage, and if you're willing to weed through the countless features and figure out which of the seven plans is right for you, I can see it being incredibly useful and powerful. But it's pretty clearly for the power user, and you know who you are. Grandma Millie should steer clear.
YouSendIt and WeTransfer occupy similar space, I think, since they're really e-mail-centric services. If you need a basic means of disseminating files, WeTransfer's a great option, while YouSendIt is much more robust and offers more features.
Finally, RapidShare's best feature is its front page: the ability to just upload a file and then shoot the link out to a few friends makes it ideal for a quick transfer. Anything beyond that I find suspect, and information just isn't as readily available on their site as it needs to be.
What you're left with now are five services that all occupy very specific niches. Of all of them, I think FilesAnywhere tries the hardest to cover all the bases, but even ignoring quibbles with their interface design there is complexity that must be added in order to handle all of those different uses. But there isn't a single authentically bad or silly service in this lot, and if one (or all!) of them sounds like it suits your needs, godspeed.
Google Apps Standard Edition Review BY: Jay Garmon, NotebookReview.com Editor
By Jay Garmon
Google has made no secret of wanting to oust Microsoft as the premier enterprise software provider on the planet, but can Google Apps really displace Microsoft Office, SharePoint and Exchange -- for free? We put Google Apps Standard Edition to the test in this review.
What's in Google Apps?
Signup page for Google Apps Standard EditionGoogle Apps is a subset of the various free Google web applications that you can assign to a personal web domain. Thus, rather than having an e-mail address at user@gmail.com, I can create user@yourdomain.com. Google Apps also adds under-the-hood controls you don't get from the usual Google web applications, emulating some of the broader account creation and permission controls of Microsoft Exchange Server and Microsoft SharePoint.
There are ostensibly several different "tracks" for Google Apps, targeting either business, educational institutions, governments or non-profits. For the most part, there are no functional distinctions between these product groups; everybody gets the same set of Google Apps at the same price, but the marketing copy is different. The only difference that matters is that between the free Google Apps Standard Edition and the paid Google Apps Premier Edition.
Deshboard for Google Apps Standard EditionGoogle Apps Standard Edition includes private versions of Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar, and Google Sites. Standard Edition is limited to 50 users per domain and roughly 8 GB of storage per user (7GB of mail storage, 1 GB of document storage). Premier Edition throws in Google Video, Google Groups, unlimited users, 25 GB per-user storage, and additional user controls and tech support; it will cost you $50 per user per year.
The quartet of applications in Google Apps Standard Edition are designed to replace the major functions of Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Exchange Server, and Microsoft SharePoint Server. These apps are accessed through the web browser, rather than as desktop applications. This means you'll need an internet connection to fully access your apps, but in return Google Apps can run on virtually any operating system. Each app is assigned to a subdomain of your Google Apps domain, with your private Gmail available at mail.yourdomain.com, Google Calendar at calendar.yourdomain.com, Google Docs at docs.yourdomain.com, and the Google Sites intranet platform available at sites.yourdomain.com. Google Apps user accounts can also access the Google Talk instant messaging client, and can sync with a number of mobile operating systems. Using Google Gears and/or the Google Chrome browser allows you to sync most of your content to a local PC, so even if your internet connection fails you can access most or all of your data.
Bear in mind, the entire design philosophy behind Google Apps is to offer only the major functionality that most users will commonly need. The Google Docs word processor doesn't offer a tenth of the features of Microsoft Word, but Google Docs does include all the text formatting, saving, printing, and sharing options that comprise 90 percent of typical Microsoft Word usage. The same "just what you need" minimum functionality applies to all components of Google Apps. There are no pivot tables, no complex mail-merge wizards, and no mass library of presentation sound effects to choose from. If you're a power user of any proprietary software, Google Apps will not meet all your needs -- at least not out of the box.
What You Can Add to Google Apps
Google Apps marketplace mainpageThe Google Apps Marketplace offers -- either as giveaways or as for-sale products -- a wide selection of third-party web applications that integrate with Google Apps. Need a CRM app that integrates with your Google Apps contact lists? No problem. An expense reporting tool that links to your online financial spreadsheets? You're covered. Project management apps that sync with Google calendar and private Gmail? Take your pick. It's simply a question of matching cost to functionality. Moreover, most of these apps can be deployed to specific user accounts, so you can give your employees just the apps they need and not waste money licensing helpdesk apps for sales leads, or marketing apps for engineers.
You can add data to Google Apps almost as easily as you add third-party applications. If you are presently running an Exchange Server, Google offers an Exchange migration tool to directly transport your existing e-mail archives to your Google Apps mail domain.
Costs and Savings
Strictly speaking, even Google Apps Standard Edition isn't totally free, because you have to purchase a web domain to assign to your Google Apps. This will cost you seven to ten dollars annually, with the latter price being what Google charges you to buy a domain through them. No matter how you slice it, that's still a small price to pay compared with the costs of licensing traditional desktop software, plus any hardware you might allocate to run e-mail or network storage servers.
Google purports to estimate how much money you can "save" with Google apps at GoneGoogle.com. In truth, this sales-gimmick is a better illustration of how much Google Apps is worth. Gone Google claims that I saved some $30,000 annually by using Google Apps for my personal domain, JayGarmon.net. I never would or could spend even a tenth of that running my personal domain, but then I'd never set up a seven-gigabyte web-accessible mail account on my own server, with full RAID recovery, or VPN access to my document folder and my personal intranet (which I also wouldn't have set up). Replacing all that functionality with proprietary hardware and software may have cost me $30,000, but that's an argument for how much Google Apps is worth, not how much it saves.
What You Don't Get
Support page for Google Apps Standard EditionThe single most compelling reason to pay the $50 per user per year for Google Apps Premiere Edition is also the single greatest risk associated with Google Apps Standard Edition: tech support. If you're a paying Google Apps user, you get an actual phone number you can call in the unlikely event that your account data is hacked or corrupted. With Google Apps standard edition you're offered a support forum and FAQ setup, which is to say you're on your own to figure out most problems. Google has a very solid track record of uptime and data integrity, but in the worst-case scenario of data loss, Google Apps Standard Edition customers simply can't directly contact Google for help.
Conclusion
Any business with fewer than 50 employees should consider Google Apps Standard Edition. Small to medium businesses are exactly the sort of organizations that probably don't have (and can't afford) the on-staff technical expertise to run a mail server and a helpdesk. Even with the basic functionality limitations of Google Apps Standard Edition, the price simply can't be beat. For $10 per year in domain costs, you can avoid paying for virtually any software license or server hardware. The functionality you lack is more than made up for in the money you don't spend.
Google has made no secret of wanting to oust Microsoft as the premier enterprise software provider on the planet, but can Google Apps really displace Microsoft Office, SharePoint and Exchange -- for free? We put Google Apps Standard Edition to the test in this review.
What's in Google Apps?
Signup page for Google Apps Standard EditionGoogle Apps is a subset of the various free Google web applications that you can assign to a personal web domain. Thus, rather than having an e-mail address at user@gmail.com, I can create user@yourdomain.com. Google Apps also adds under-the-hood controls you don't get from the usual Google web applications, emulating some of the broader account creation and permission controls of Microsoft Exchange Server and Microsoft SharePoint.
There are ostensibly several different "tracks" for Google Apps, targeting either business, educational institutions, governments or non-profits. For the most part, there are no functional distinctions between these product groups; everybody gets the same set of Google Apps at the same price, but the marketing copy is different. The only difference that matters is that between the free Google Apps Standard Edition and the paid Google Apps Premier Edition.
Deshboard for Google Apps Standard EditionGoogle Apps Standard Edition includes private versions of Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar, and Google Sites. Standard Edition is limited to 50 users per domain and roughly 8 GB of storage per user (7GB of mail storage, 1 GB of document storage). Premier Edition throws in Google Video, Google Groups, unlimited users, 25 GB per-user storage, and additional user controls and tech support; it will cost you $50 per user per year.
The quartet of applications in Google Apps Standard Edition are designed to replace the major functions of Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Exchange Server, and Microsoft SharePoint Server. These apps are accessed through the web browser, rather than as desktop applications. This means you'll need an internet connection to fully access your apps, but in return Google Apps can run on virtually any operating system. Each app is assigned to a subdomain of your Google Apps domain, with your private Gmail available at mail.yourdomain.com, Google Calendar at calendar.yourdomain.com, Google Docs at docs.yourdomain.com, and the Google Sites intranet platform available at sites.yourdomain.com. Google Apps user accounts can also access the Google Talk instant messaging client, and can sync with a number of mobile operating systems. Using Google Gears and/or the Google Chrome browser allows you to sync most of your content to a local PC, so even if your internet connection fails you can access most or all of your data.
Bear in mind, the entire design philosophy behind Google Apps is to offer only the major functionality that most users will commonly need. The Google Docs word processor doesn't offer a tenth of the features of Microsoft Word, but Google Docs does include all the text formatting, saving, printing, and sharing options that comprise 90 percent of typical Microsoft Word usage. The same "just what you need" minimum functionality applies to all components of Google Apps. There are no pivot tables, no complex mail-merge wizards, and no mass library of presentation sound effects to choose from. If you're a power user of any proprietary software, Google Apps will not meet all your needs -- at least not out of the box.
What You Can Add to Google Apps
Google Apps marketplace mainpageThe Google Apps Marketplace offers -- either as giveaways or as for-sale products -- a wide selection of third-party web applications that integrate with Google Apps. Need a CRM app that integrates with your Google Apps contact lists? No problem. An expense reporting tool that links to your online financial spreadsheets? You're covered. Project management apps that sync with Google calendar and private Gmail? Take your pick. It's simply a question of matching cost to functionality. Moreover, most of these apps can be deployed to specific user accounts, so you can give your employees just the apps they need and not waste money licensing helpdesk apps for sales leads, or marketing apps for engineers.
You can add data to Google Apps almost as easily as you add third-party applications. If you are presently running an Exchange Server, Google offers an Exchange migration tool to directly transport your existing e-mail archives to your Google Apps mail domain.
Costs and Savings
Strictly speaking, even Google Apps Standard Edition isn't totally free, because you have to purchase a web domain to assign to your Google Apps. This will cost you seven to ten dollars annually, with the latter price being what Google charges you to buy a domain through them. No matter how you slice it, that's still a small price to pay compared with the costs of licensing traditional desktop software, plus any hardware you might allocate to run e-mail or network storage servers.
Google purports to estimate how much money you can "save" with Google apps at GoneGoogle.com. In truth, this sales-gimmick is a better illustration of how much Google Apps is worth. Gone Google claims that I saved some $30,000 annually by using Google Apps for my personal domain, JayGarmon.net. I never would or could spend even a tenth of that running my personal domain, but then I'd never set up a seven-gigabyte web-accessible mail account on my own server, with full RAID recovery, or VPN access to my document folder and my personal intranet (which I also wouldn't have set up). Replacing all that functionality with proprietary hardware and software may have cost me $30,000, but that's an argument for how much Google Apps is worth, not how much it saves.
What You Don't Get
Support page for Google Apps Standard EditionThe single most compelling reason to pay the $50 per user per year for Google Apps Premiere Edition is also the single greatest risk associated with Google Apps Standard Edition: tech support. If you're a paying Google Apps user, you get an actual phone number you can call in the unlikely event that your account data is hacked or corrupted. With Google Apps standard edition you're offered a support forum and FAQ setup, which is to say you're on your own to figure out most problems. Google has a very solid track record of uptime and data integrity, but in the worst-case scenario of data loss, Google Apps Standard Edition customers simply can't directly contact Google for help.
Conclusion
Any business with fewer than 50 employees should consider Google Apps Standard Edition. Small to medium businesses are exactly the sort of organizations that probably don't have (and can't afford) the on-staff technical expertise to run a mail server and a helpdesk. Even with the basic functionality limitations of Google Apps Standard Edition, the price simply can't be beat. For $10 per year in domain costs, you can avoid paying for virtually any software license or server hardware. The functionality you lack is more than made up for in the money you don't spend.
Print Email my friend Share RSS Add your comment 12345 Rating: 3.0 Blatter: Mandela’s dream realised (FIFA.com) Monday 12 July 2010
FIFA and the Local Organising Committee held a post-FIFA World Cup™ press conference at the Sandton Convention Centre which was attended by FIFA President Joseph S. Blatter, Organising Committee for the FIFA World Cup Chairman and FIFA vice-president Issa Hayatou, South Africa 2010 LOC Chairman Irvin Khoza, LOC CEO Danny Jordaan and FIFA Secretary General Jerome Valcke.
After a video displaying the iconic images of the 2010 FIFA World Cup set to an African beat was displayed on the giant screen, FIFA’s Director of Communications and Public Affairs a.i. Nicolas Maingot introduced the FIFA President who opened with words of welcome to the assembled media.
FIFA President Joseph S. BlatterOpening remarksIt is the day after Match 64 of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, which was played for the first time on the African continent and specifically South Africa. I have to give a big compliment to South Africa, its people and its government, the latter especially for giving the guarantees needed to stage the FIFA World Cup and for meeting them. I have to thank the LOC, especially Irvin Khoza and Danny Jordaan, as well as all of its workers, volunteers, security staff, hospitality workers. They were great.
I also have to pay a big compliment to Africa. They proved that they could organise the FIFA World Cup and a massive competition. I said at the beginning of this competition that this was a question of trust. FIFA trusted South Africa and from this trust, people gained confidence and South Africans can be proud of what they have achieved. FIFA are satisified and as FIFA President I am more than satisfied. I am also satisfied that in Spain we had a winner who played good football.
I can only underline the comments made by the President of the Republic of South Africa, Jacob Zuma yesterday, who said that this World Cup brought people together in a sense of unity and pride.
On the level of football
As a fan and a spectator, I thought we saw some good matches and some not so good matches, but it was always entertaining. We have to remember that in terms of football, perfection does not exist. But what we did learn from this World Cup was that there are no more small national teams. Football has developed everywhere and we’ve learned that internationalism has been good for some national teams and not so good for others. It was also good to see that three of the youngest teams: Ghana, Germany and Spain doing so well – it shows that our young players are making headway.
As a fan and a spectator, I thought we saw some good matches and some not so good matches, but it was always entertaining. We have to remember that in terms of football, perfection does not exist. But what we did learn from this World Cup was that there are no more small national teams. Football has developed everywhere and we’ve learned that internationalism has been good for some national teams and not so good for others. It was also good to see that three of the youngest teams: Ghana, Germany and Spain doing so well – it shows that our young players are making headway.
On the level of organisation
After the Confederations Cup, I gave South Africa a 7.5 out of 10, but now – after a successful Final Draw and this tournament – I would give a 9, which in a University would earn the highest honours.
After the Confederations Cup, I gave South Africa a 7.5 out of 10, but now – after a successful Final Draw and this tournament – I would give a 9, which in a University would earn the highest honours.
On the Final and the Final referee
Overall we saw an improvement in terms of Fair Play at this tournament, but the Final caused this level to drop slightly. The referee and his trio had a very hard task during this game and he was not helped. I always say that football is a school of life, based on discipline and respect. You learn to win, which is easy, but when you lose – you must lose with discipline and respect.
Overall we saw an improvement in terms of Fair Play at this tournament, but the Final caused this level to drop slightly. The referee and his trio had a very hard task during this game and he was not helped. I always say that football is a school of life, based on discipline and respect. You learn to win, which is easy, but when you lose – you must lose with discipline and respect.
Concluding remarks
This World Cup had a special momentum, linked with a history of freedom and the history of one man. This man is still living, at the age of 92 and this is a man who has suffered so much. But despite this, upon his release from prison, he spoke of peace and understanding. I met him for the first time in 1992 and he had a dream – to bring the World Cup to his country. The dream came true in May 2004 when South Africa were awarded the 2010 FIFA World Cup. He brought the World Cup to South Africa. He wanted to attend the tournament – and last night he fulfilled that ambition. So, I must pay a homage to the greatest living humanist – Nelson ‘Madiba’ Mandela.
This World Cup had a special momentum, linked with a history of freedom and the history of one man. This man is still living, at the age of 92 and this is a man who has suffered so much. But despite this, upon his release from prison, he spoke of peace and understanding. I met him for the first time in 1992 and he had a dream – to bring the World Cup to his country. The dream came true in May 2004 when South Africa were awarded the 2010 FIFA World Cup. He brought the World Cup to South Africa. He wanted to attend the tournament – and last night he fulfilled that ambition. So, I must pay a homage to the greatest living humanist – Nelson ‘Madiba’ Mandela.
FIFA vice-president Issa Hayatou
I was so impressed by the willingness of South Africans to show the world their nation, regardless of their social status. Everyone mobilized to make this event a great success, even when South Africa were knocked out of the tournament.
I was so impressed by the willingness of South Africans to show the world their nation, regardless of their social status. Everyone mobilized to make this event a great success, even when South Africa were knocked out of the tournament.
South Africa 2010 LOC Chairman Irvin Khoza
This tournament provided many great memories. One which stood out was Archbishop Desmond Tutu dancing at the Opening Match – and the last time I’d seen him dancing was back in 1994 during the first time he voted. But the crowning experience was ‘Madiba’s’ appearance in Soccer City. His struggle was not in vein. This World Cup has made a statement. South Africa has never been so united.
This tournament provided many great memories. One which stood out was Archbishop Desmond Tutu dancing at the Opening Match – and the last time I’d seen him dancing was back in 1994 during the first time he voted. But the crowning experience was ‘Madiba’s’ appearance in Soccer City. His struggle was not in vein. This World Cup has made a statement. South Africa has never been so united.
LOC CEO Danny Jordaan
The Opening Match was an incredible moment and gave me an incredible feeling. A dream came true on 11 June. I have to thank President Blatter for making the dream come true, as he showed great commitment, courage and vision to bring the FIFA World Cup to Africa. And in FIFA we found a synergy. We shared a common vision and they understood the heartbeat of our country.
The Opening Match was an incredible moment and gave me an incredible feeling. A dream came true on 11 June. I have to thank President Blatter for making the dream come true, as he showed great commitment, courage and vision to bring the FIFA World Cup to Africa. And in FIFA we found a synergy. We shared a common vision and they understood the heartbeat of our country.
Iniesta puts Spain on top of the world
Champions of Europe and now champions of the world, Spain captured football's Holy Grail for the first time with a 1-0 victory over the Netherlands thanks to Andres Iniesta's 116th-minute strike at Soccer City.
The solitary goal came with penalties looming as substitute Cesc Fabregas played in Iniesta and the little midfielder drove emphatically across Maarten Stekelenburg and into the far corner. With this victory – their fourth successive single-goal win in South Africa – Spain became the eighth name on the FIFA World Cup™ Trophy and also the first European team to have triumphed on a different continent. For the Netherlands, who lost defender John Heitinga to a red card in extra time, there is only the heartache of another tale of what might have been after they completed a hat-trick of Final losses.
This was a match preceded by much talk of two like-minded footballing cultures, of the influence of Dutchmen like Johan Cruyff and Rinus Michels, of 'tiki taka' and Total Football. In many ways, as the first 116 minutes showed, it was also a case of the irresistible force versus the immovable object. The Dutch had won 14 straight games to get to the Final, in qualifying and the tournament proper, and Spain 15 out of 16, their only slip the defeat by Switzerland in their first game here in South Africa.
It was the Spanish found their stride first, living up to their pre-game billing as favourites. Vicente del Bosque's side dominated possession and created the early chances. With the Dutch penned inside their half, goalkeeper Stekelenburg had to make a save after five minutes, diving low to stop a Sergio Ramos header from Xavi's free-kick from the right. Gerard Pique looked poised to follow up only to be denied by a combination of Joris Mathijsen and Dirk Kuyt.
Ramos came again in the tenth minute, beating Kuyt on the right and driving in a low centre that Heitinga deflected behind. From the corner came another scare for the Netherlands. Xavi played the ball back to Xabi Alonso whose cross went beyond the far post to David Villa but the in-form No7 sliced his volley into the side-netting. After those near things, however, both defences got on top with none of the flair players on either side able to take a grip on proceedings. Instead the yellow-card count began to rise with Nigel de Jong becoming the fifth player in Howard Webb's notebook by the time the half-hour mark arrived.
With the orange sections of the 84,490 Soccer City crowd finding their voice, Bert van Marwijk's men almost gave them something to sing about from a corner in the 37th minute. Robben rolled the ball to Mark van Bommel on the edge of the box and although he failed to make a clean connection he unwittingly diverted the ball on to the unmarked Mathijsen but the defender missed his kick. As half-time approached, Iker Casillas had barely had a save to make but entering stoppage time, he had to be alert to deny Robben at his near post as a spell of Dutch pressure ended with the winger spearing in a low shot from the corner of the box.
Puyol, Spain's semi-final matchwinner, showed his aerial threat once more minutes after the restart when he rose above Heitinga and headed to the far post but Joan Capdevila failed to make contact. The game was gradually opening up and the Dutch spurned a golden opportunity in the 62nd minute when Wesley Sneijder sent Robben running clear. Casillas came to Spain's rescue, deflecting the shot behind with his right foot when falling the wrong way.
Spain coach Del Bosque had already sent on Jesus Navas for Pedro on the hour and the winger helped pick a hole in the Dutch defence in the 70th minute. Xavi sent him flying down the right into the box and when Heitinga failed to deal with Navas's low cross, the ball fell to Villa who looked odds-on to score only to see his effort deflected behind. Ramos was equally profligate after 78 minutes when he headed over a Xavi centre when unmarked, after Villa had forced another corner.
Spain were looking the more likely winners and it took Sneijder of all people to foil Iniesta with a smart tackle after his jinking run into the box. Yet Robben's pace was a persistent threat and the Oranje No11 almost embarrassed Puyol in the 82nd minute, speeding clear of the Spain defender when second-favourite to reach a through-ball. Resisting Pique's attempt to tackle too, he was foiled only by Casillas, the captain saving at Robben's feet as the Dutchman tried to round him.
Extra time began with opportunities for Spain. Xavi failed to connect when well positioned and when the ball ran to Villa, his shot went wide off an orange shirt. Substitute Fabregas then broke clear on to Iniesta's through-ball but was foiled by Stekelenburg. Mathijsen headed wide from a corner but like waves, Spanish attacks kept rolling on to the Netherlands back line and Navas was close with a shot deflected into the side-netting.
Fernando Torres replaced Villa midway through the extra period and Spain gained a man advantage four minutes later with Heitinga's dismissal for pulling back Iniesta on the edge of the box, the offence earning him a second yellow. Iniesta would not be denied, however, and his fine late strike put Spain into the history books and left a Dutch dream shattered. (FIFA.COM)
CONGRATULATION FOR SPAIN TEAM FOOTBALL
CONGRATULATION FOR SPAIN TEAM FOOTBALL
WORLD CUP CHAMPION 2010 SOUTH AFRICA
1. SPAIN
2. NETHERLAND
3. GERMANY
WORLD CUP CHAMPION 2010 SOUTH AFRICA
1. SPAIN
2. NETHERLAND
3. GERMANY
Monday, 5 July 2010
prediction germany versus spain
prediction germany versus spain
coach germany team is Joachim Loew, he is change from Juergen Klinsmann from world up 2006 in germany
with consistency performance, eksperiance players, and aplication tactic in field the germany team is name as panser team
germany get thropy world cup in 1954, 1974 and 1990
after win from Argentina 4-0 in Green Point Stadium, Cape Town, saturday (3/7/2010) night WIB. two gol from Miroslav Klose, one gol oleh Thomas Mueller and ones from Arne Friedrich.
germany team is favorite to win in 2010
Jerman di Piala Dunia 2010
the capten Iker Casillas. the best keeper with record defender is Carlos Puyol. player Barcelona with disipln with Joan Capdevila, Sergio Ramos and Carlos Marchena make this defender team in back team
Spanyol di Piala Dunia 2010
fro two analysis i thing germany get one modals for winner the match because the dreams team with fisic and strategy
coach germany team is Joachim Loew, he is change from Juergen Klinsmann from world up 2006 in germany
with consistency performance, eksperiance players, and aplication tactic in field the germany team is name as panser team
germany get thropy world cup in 1954, 1974 and 1990
after win from Argentina 4-0 in Green Point Stadium, Cape Town, saturday (3/7/2010) night WIB. two gol from Miroslav Klose, one gol oleh Thomas Mueller and ones from Arne Friedrich.
germany team is favorite to win in 2010
Jerman di Piala Dunia 2010
- Jerman VS Australia: (4-0) di Durban Stadium Senin, 14 Juni 2010
- Jerman VS Serbia: (0-1) di Port Elizabeth Stadium Jumat, 18 Juni 2010
- Ghana VS Jerman: (0-1) di Soccer City Stadium Kamis, 24 Juni 2010
- Jerman Vs Inggris: (4-1) di Free State Stadium.
- Jerman Vs Argentina (4-0) babak perempatfinal
this period is time gold for Spanyol.
after succes in Austria-Siwss, skuad La Roja go to world cup 2010 with perfect match from 10 macth. but in confederation cup 2009 spanyol loses from USAspanyol team is beautifull play in the match with short ball and long ball supply striker in center is Xavi, Andres Iniesta, Xabi Alonso, David Silva and Marcos Senna .striker is David Villa and Fernando Torres
coach spanyol team is Vicente del Bosque is eksperiance coach in Real Madrid as long as 1999-2003 with 7 winner championship
Del Bosque hope same prestisius as Luis Aragones with win same in 1970
Spanyol di Piala Dunia 2010
- Spanyol VS Swiss: (0-1) di Durban Stadium Rabu, 16 Juni 2010
- Spanyol VS Honduras: (2-0) di Ellis Park Stadium Selasa, 22 Juni 2010
- Chile VS Spanyol: (1-2) di Loftus Versfeld Stadium Sabtu, 26 Juni 2010
- Spanyol Vs Portugal (1-0) di stadion Ellis Park Rabu, 30 Juni 2010
- Spanyol Vs Paraguay (1-0) babak perempatfinal
fro two analysis i thing germany get one modals for winner the match because the dreams team with fisic and strategy
Pique: We must be more ruthless
Pique: We must be more ruthless
(FIFA.com) Sunday 4 July 2010
Indeed, never before have Spain appeared in the semi-finals at the global showpiece, though such was the narrow nature of their 1-0 last-eight win over Paraguay that the achievement took some time to sink in. “Everyone’s still looking quite tense because it was a really tough game,” Pique told FIFA.com.
“Paraguay made life very difficult for us. They kept things very tight at the back, had a few chances and even a penalty. But from that point on I think we controlled the game, created opportunities of our own and, despite also missing a penalty, we managed to grab a goal and win the game.”
La Albirroja strike pair Oscar Cardozo and Nelson Valdez were a constant threat to Pique and his fellow defenders, with the usually unflappable Barcelona man put off his stride to the point of giving away a penalty for a foul on the rangy Benfica hitman. Fortunately for him, Spain captain Iker Casillas was up to the task of saving Cardozo’s tame spot-kick.
“He was brilliant today, the man of the match,” said a clearly relieved Pique, who left Barcelona’s youth system to join United, before returning to the Camp Nou in summer 2008. “Iker saved the penalty and made two fantastic saves later on. It’s a real privilege having him in the side; you know he’ll always come to your rescue.”
Our objective is to win the Trophy and we’ll go home with a sour taste in our mouths if we fall short.
Gerard Pique
“They are a great team with wonderful players,” said Pique of his side’s opponents on 7 July at the Durban Stadium. “It’s going to be very tough to stop them because they’re in form and will be hugely confident after emphatic wins over England and Argentina. But we’re looking good too and we’ve proved that we’re solid at the back after not conceding in our last two games.
“It’ll be a very difficult match,” continued Pique, when the question of Die Nationalmannschaft seeking revenge for that continental reverse came up. “There are new players on both sides, such as myself, who didn’t play in the final of EURO 2008. So I’m sure this’ll be a very different game but we’ll be doing our best to win again.”
Scorer of the winning goal in the teams’ European title decider two summers ago was Fernando Torres. With El Niño yet to score at South Africa, Pique was quick to back the Liverpool striker to come good: “He’s definitely going to score at this World Cup. Let’s hope he gets off the mark in the semis.”
One player having no trouble finding the net is David Villa, set to be an Azulgrana team-mate of Pique in 2010/11, who has scored five of Spain’s six goals at the finals on South African soil. “When a striker is on form then everything seems to go in,” said Pique of El Guaje’s 83rd-minute winner against La Albirroja. “The Paraguay game was a clear example. The ball hit both posts before going in, whereas on another day it might have bounced back out again.”
Yet despite boasting the tournament’s top scorer and having safely negotiated their way into the last four, Pique still feels Spain have plenty of work still to do. “We need to start controlling games better. There are periods in games when we’re under the cosh and that’s when we struggle.
“We also need to be more clinical in front of goal. We’re finding it really hard to score and are winning games by just one goal. We need our attackers to be more ruthless, we need to score more goals,” said a player who has literally put his body on the line for the cause during this tournament. Indeed, having needed stitches for a gash received in the melee leading to Switzerland’s winner in Spain’s Group H opener, he burst his lip in a clash with an opposing forward in the very next game against Honduras.
Not that he will mind another couple of scars should La Roja go all the way to a first ever FIFA World Cup crown. “Our aim is to keep making history,” he said as the interview concluded. “Our objective is to win the Trophy and we’ll go home with a sour taste in our mouths if we fall short.”
final predictions south africa 2010
after see qualification to quarter final world cup south africa 2010 we see 4 best team in sei final germany spanyol,uruguay, and netherland
four team is mine same changes for world cup champion 2010 in south africa but only one team the winner
from match to match germany have power panser to get ,,spanyol get spirit to winer the first wc2010
but uruguay is get the moment thirtd to the winner, and the total football come back from netherland
...who the champion
germany or netherland....wait together
four team is mine same changes for world cup champion 2010 in south africa but only one team the winner
from match to match germany have power panser to get ,,spanyol get spirit to winer the first wc2010
but uruguay is get the moment thirtd to the winner, and the total football come back from netherland
...who the champion
germany or netherland....wait together
uruguay vs netherland and germany vs spain
Uruguay | vs. | Netherlands | - | 7 Jul 01.30 | |||||||
Jerman | vs. | Spanyol | - | 8 Jul 01.30 |
uruguay vs netherland and germany vs spain |
Saturday, 3 July 2010
Players top goals
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)